On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 at 22:58, Gyorgy Sarvari via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > In principle I think that it's about as I can make it on my own (sans AB > failures[1]), but there would be a few question marks on my end: > > 1. If you have a better idea for relevant Makefile.in.in heurestics in > autotools.bbclass, I'm listening > 2. I *think* that the Makevars concatenation makes actual sense, and the > build success is not only an accident - but I'm not 100% sure if that's > the best way to handle this. If you know gettext, I'd like to hear your > opinion. (This was inspired by gettextize's behavior. Upon running it, > it copies the Makevars.template with default values in the po folder, > and asks you to set up all the variables from it in your Makevars file)
First, thanks for working on this. Gettext recipe easily wins the 'least sexy' award in oe-core. Second, the same discussion has stalled in previous update proposal (to 0.24), after Ross suggested we should just try to use gettextize. Ross, can you please comment? We do need to get this update in, and maybe attempts to 'do things right' would be too counter productive. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#222654): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/222654 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/114982746/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
