On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:01 AM, Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > Defining an UBOOT_ name-spaced variable in image-fitimage.conf looks > strange. But I see why you ended up with that: > * All the mkimage related variables start with UBOOT_ > * This variable is used by the kernel-fit-image.bbclass only. Defining > it in uboot-config.bbclass looks strange as well. > > But, all UBOOT_ variables are defined in uboot-config.bbclass. Would it > be more consistent if the variable would be defined in uboot- > config.bbclass or if the variable would be renamed to > FIT_MKIMAGE_EXTRA_OPTS? >
Hi Adrian, Sure. We can use FIT_MKIMAGE_EXTRA_OPTS. I have uploaded a new patch to address this.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#228113): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/228113 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/116710036/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
