On Mon, 2025-12-22 at 22:34 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 9:13 AM Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 15:22 -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > > As discussed in the weekly engineering call, I'm sending this as > > > single series even though it crossed boundaries of the repositories. > > > > > > I don't have access to meta-yocto-contrib yet, so I haven't pushed > > > the component parts to contrib branches yet, but will do that for > > > future pull requests. > > > > > > I'm using this as a first run through some things I've cooked up > > > to coordinate the patches across the repos. The formatting is my > > > own, so apologies if it isn't clear .. and we'll see if it all > > > > > > Now to the series for OE-core: > > > > > > - We have stable updates to 6.12 > > > - A kern-tools fix > > > - Updates to 6.17 > > > - Removal of 6.17 > > > - Introduction of 6.18 > > > - Bump to libc-headers to 6.18 > > > > > > I've built and booted what I can locally, and I know that the > > > major architectures work, and are functional with respect to > > > core features. > > > > > > I have more libc-headers testing running against meta-oe and > > > muslc, so there may be some breakage there and I'll help deal > > > with that if it happens. > > > > > > The update and then removal of 6.17 is on purpose. In case any > > > one was using it, they should get the latest tested before it > > > starts to be removed. > > > > > > For meta-yocto: > > > > > > - removal of any remaining 6.17 references > > > - introduction of 6.18 > > > > > > The meta-yocto default changes are obviously REALLY RFC/RFT > > > there will be issues, but I've provided them anyway to make it > > > clear that we are going to 6.18 as the new default for all the > > > variants. > > > > > > Once we get 6.18 fully green and the h/w references udpated, > > > I'll remove 6.12 and 6.16 from master. That isn't in this series > > > by design. > > > > I ran this through some testing and it isn't straight forward. > > > > Back online after a 10 hour drive! > > > We need a newer strace with the newer kernel so I queued that patch > > from Robert. That caused ptest failures so I disabled the failing bpf > > strace ptests. > > ok. I'll ignore strace and assume that bump will handle it. > > > > > ltp failed to compile so I backported a patch to fix that. > > > > ack'd > > > We still have a cryptodev-module failure: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/6/builds/2922 > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/25/builds/2897 > > (all world builds I think) > > I can handle this one, it'll be.a day or so, but I also haven't checked > the autoupdate list yet to see if this is in it. I'll check the lists before > I start and see if anyone else has an update in flight.
I'd tried the srcrev change on master next and it worked. I've taked your patch, thanks! > > and an initramfs module space problem: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/22/builds/2931 > > And a config warning (easy for me to fix).' > > For the space. Is it only genericarm64 that we do this test on ? It > could either e normal kernel size increases, or it could be all the work > that has been done in genericarm64's config that has causes this. > > If it is normal kernel, then I can have a look for something obvious, > and then we can increase the size. If it is only genericarm64, then > we should get Mikko's opinion on what might be options we could > tweak to reduce the size. I don't want to break things too badly given it is the holidays but I do want to keep patches moving. I've therefore taken most of your series except the bits making the default 6.18. This gets us on the new point releases, bumps the CVE info, drops 6.17 and adds 6.18 for testing along with switching to the 6.18 headers. I included the cryptodev-module tweak, the ltp fix, the strace fixes and a tweak to increase the initramfs size by 20MB. The initramfs issue is genericarm64 specific and Mikko was in favour of increasing the initramfs size. I am a bit worried about the size issues there but that is a bigger issue to think about at a different time. This does leave genericarm64 kernel config warnings: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/60/builds/2902 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/22/builds/2933 meta-arm failures: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/75/builds/2786 meta-virt failures: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/89/builds/2761 as the issues we need to resolve before we change the default to 6.18. Hopefully a sensible compromise for the holidays! :) Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#228467): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/228467 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/116848895/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
