On 2025-12-21 4:37 p.m., Steve Sakoman via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
From: Jayasurya Maganuru<[email protected]>
Fixes [YOCTO #15853]
Steve, Yoann, and others,
This commit as well as 17/18 made it into whinlatter before master.
Was that intentional ?
❯ git log --oneline origin/whinlatter ^master
meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass
9964fa3da2 (origin/whinlatter) populate_sdk_ext: keep SDK_TARGETS so
SPDX/SBOM tasks remain in locked sigs
❯ git log --oneline origin/whinlatter ^master
9964fa3da2 (origin/whinlatter) populate_sdk_ext: keep SDK_TARGETS so
SPDX/SBOM tasks remain in locked sigs
3f57280caa create-spdx-image-3.0: Image SPDX/SBOM tasks are retained for
eSDK installation
7f02b3f811 cve-update: Avoid NFS caching issues
The patches has been sitting in master-next for a while since people
have some concerns about them, IIRC.
What do we do now, revert ?
Apologies for missing the review deadline.
Maybe next year, there should be a longer merge freeze around Xmas time
so that there's sufficient review.
../Randy
The filtering in populate_sdk_ext.bbclass was removing all image targets from
the locked signatures, including the main SDK images (SDK_TARGETS). As a
result, their tasks including the image SPDX/SBOM tasks were not added to
locked-sigs.inc.
Without these entries, the eSDK lacked the necessary sstate, and the installer
attempted to run the missing tasks during installation, leading to unexpected
task execution errors.
This patch keeps SDK_TARGETS (and their multilib variants) in the locked
signatures so their SPDX/SBOM tasks are included. With those tasks in the
sstate cache, the eSDK installs cleanly without needing to re-run anything.
Signed-off-by: Jayasurya Maganuru<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie<[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 920c5de570ec575a9eaccb105461394d9fa0f1db)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman<[email protected]>
---
meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass
b/meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass
index 2859320ddf..2838ca1a03 100644
--- a/meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes-recipe/populate_sdk_ext.bbclass
@@ -460,6 +460,15 @@ def prepare_locked_cache(d, baseoutpath, derivative,
conf_initpath):
# Filter the locked signatures file to just the sstate tasks we are interested in
excluded_targets = get_sdk_install_targets(d, images_only=True)
+ sdk_targets = d.getVar('SDK_TARGETS')
+ ext_sdk_target_set = set(multilib_pkg_extend(d, sdk_targets).split())
+ excluded_set = set(excluded_targets.split())
+
+ # Ensure SDK_TARGETS and their image SPDX/SBOM tasks are included in the
locked signatures,
+ # as they are required during eSDK installation.
+ filtered_excluded_set = excluded_set - ext_sdk_target_set
+ excluded_targets = ' '.join(filtered_excluded_set)
+
sigfile = d.getVar('WORKDIR') + '/locked-sigs.inc'
lockedsigs_pruned = baseoutpath + '/conf/locked-sigs.inc'
#nativesdk-only sigfile to merge into locked-sigs.inc
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#228933):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/228933
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/116893601/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
