On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 at 03:21, Chen, Qi <[email protected]> wrote: > The steps for the test case should be simple and easy to reproduce. > Do you have any suggestion how to fix this issue? > Note that SDK does not have bitbake and OE metadata there. > > Or do you want me to first send out a patch to add an OEQA selftest case? > Will that be accepted?
I would suggest that you develop that patch first, and send it as a RFC (because it is expected to fail). I'd then be able to use the patch to reproduce the failure locally, and come up with suggestions (or maybe even patches) to address it. That would ensure the use case is officially supported, and will guard it against future regressions. Runqemu code is too complex and over-engineered, and to be honest, needs to be somehow simplified and rewritten, so when we see opportunities to simplify logic in it, we take it. Your use case fell victim of that because there were no tests or other indication that the code is necessary, but it wasn't intentional, and restoring support for the use case should be fine, but this time it should come with tests. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#230427): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/230427 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117539270/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
