On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 at 16:26, Martin Jansa via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with all above and I am not against this upgrade. > > I'm just pointing that you shouldn't call it "latest stable release" > in the cover letter (which is what triggered me to check the release > notes if mesa changed their versioning). I don't think you need to > re-send, it's not even in the commit messages and nobody will read > cover letter after it's merged :). I need to point out this: https://docs.mesa3d.org/releasing.html which does not mention anything special about .0 vs .1, it just says that a .0 is a feature release that happens after (typically) four release candidates, and it is followed by bugfix releases. I suspect this '.0 is a development release' language in release notes is some old auto-template text that no one bothered to adjust. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#231222): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/231222 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117791631/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
