On 5/9/12 10:01 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:

Op 9 mei 2012, om 16:52 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:

On 5/9/12 3:50 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:

Op 9 mei 2012, om 10:20 heeft Robert Yang het volgende geschreven:

Don't remove rpmlib when INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN=1, otherwise the
list_installed_packages would get nothing in the second build.

What happens when I do a build, enable INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN and do another build?

The intention is that only the packages that have been changed/upgraded will be 
installed.  Instead of the whole image being generated from scratch each time.

That's what INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN does, yes. What I'm asking is how this patch 
addresses the sequence I outlined above.

Explain what you mean by "build".

Using the following:

. ./oe-init-build-env build-test
<setup local.conf w/ rpm packaging and INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN>
bitbake core-image-core
--- time passes, git pull pulls in changes ---
bitbake core-image-core

The second "build", only the changed packages will be added to the image.

You you are using different build directories, then it doesn't re-use anything. The purpose of this is incremental software development within a single build directory.

--Mark

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to