On Thu, 2026-03-12 at 19:28 -0500, Mark Hatle via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> This work is effectively based on the 'v7' of the 'standalone wic'
> submission.  It was requested that the submission be broken into
> individual parts so we can review and get merge things individually.
> 
> Changes from v7:
> 
> Introduction of additional (previous implementation) vfat 4k tests.
> 
> Update the test suite to add a new cmdline argument test in addition
> to (not replacing) the previous variable version of the test.
> 
> Update the test case to include fat partition tests.
> 
> Cleanup Deprecation message so it only displays once, if the older
> style is used.  In v7 the message may have been displayed twice.
> 
> Mark Hatle (1):
>   oeqa/selftest: wic: Add vfat to test_wic_sector_size
> 
> Trevor Woerner (1):
>   wic: re-implement sector-size support

Something in here failed in testing:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/3519
wic.Wic2.test_mkfs_extraopts
ERROR: A sector/block size is specified in both the mkfs-extraopts argument (-S 
1024) and the wic arguments (512) and they do not match.
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3401
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3292

Cheers,

Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#233041): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/233041
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118290040/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to