On Mon, 2026-03-16 at 11:21 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > [email protected] > > <[email protected] > > > On Behalf Of Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org > > Sent: den 14 mars 2026 11:27 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] sstate/sstatesig: Abstract dummy package > > architectures into layer.conf settings > > > > Other layers need to be able to add dummy recipes. To do this add > > DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_SDK and DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_TARGET in > > layer.conf > > which can be used to add these to the right places in the code. > > > > Don't add the variables to task signatures as these only matter in > > the > > context of constructed images and not the recipes. > > > > d-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/classes-global/sstate.bbclass | 7 +++---- > > meta/conf/layer.conf | 3 +++ > > meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py | 9 +++------ > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/classes-global/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes- > > global/sstate.bbclass > > index a7c3f5332a2..fe70a976869 100644 > > --- a/meta/classes-global/sstate.bbclass > > +++ b/meta/classes-global/sstate.bbclass > > @@ -86,14 +86,13 @@ SSTATE_ARCHS = " \ > > ${BUILD_ARCH}_${ORIGNATIVELSBSTRING} \ > > ${BUILD_ARCH}_${SDK_ARCH}_${SDK_OS} \ > > ${SDK_ARCH}-${SDKPKGSUFFIX} \ > > - buildtools-dummy-${SDKPKGSUFFIX} \ > > - sdk-provides-dummy-target \ > > - sdk-provides-dummy-${SDKPKGSUFFIX} \ > > + ${DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_SDK} \ > > + ${DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_TARGET} \ > > allarch \ > > ${SSTATE_ARCHS_TUNEPKG} \ > > ${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS} \ > > ${MACHINE_ARCH}" > > -SSTATE_ARCHS[vardepsexclude] = "ORIGNATIVELSBSTRING" > > +SSTATE_ARCHS[vardepsexclude] = "ORIGNATIVELSBSTRING > > DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_SDK DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_TARGET" > > > > SSTATECREATEFUNCS += "sstate_hardcode_path" > > SSTATECREATEFUNCS[vardeps] = "SSTATE_SCAN_FILES" > > diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf > > index ba25ca30296..4794e660aed 100644 > > --- a/meta/conf/layer.conf > > +++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf > > @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ SSTATE_EXCLUDEDEPS_SYSROOT += "\ > > # dependency in the recipe. > > SSTATE_EXCLUDEDEPS_SYSROOT += ".*->autoconf-archive-native" > > > > +DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_SDK = "buildtools-dummy-${SDKPKGSUFFIX} sdk- > > provides-dummy-${SDKPKGSUFFIX}" > > +DUMMY_PACKAGE_ARCHS_TARGET = "sdk-provides-dummy-target" > > Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use += for these two? > Otherwise one will have to use :append to add to them in other > layers.
That depends on whether your layer is included after core or not. I'd have thought including before core would be potentially problematic anyway... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#233248): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/233248 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118311664/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
