On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 6:23 PM Böszörményi Zoltán <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2026. 03. 23. 16:03 keltezéssel, Trevor Gamblin írta: > > > > On 2026-03-23 10:52, Zoltan Boszormenyi via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > >> 2026. 03. 23. 15:47 keltezéssel, Alexander Kanavin írta: > >>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 15:40, Böszörményi Zoltán <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> I also see other issues popping up, first in python3-installer-native. > >>>> > >>>> Probably this setting ("python-freethreading") should be a > >>>> DISTRO_FEATURE and then the python3 recipe would use that > >>>> to enable its PACKAGECONFIG. > >>>> > >>>> PYTHON_DIR in python-dir.bbclass should also be set accordingly. > >>> In patch review it was suggested that we should actually have two > >>> co-installable recipes, rather than an exclusive choice between. > >> > >> Which implies doubling every python3-* recipes, too. > > > > I think that should only be for python3 packages which actually have binary > > builds. > > Not just those. Script-only modules won't be found either > by one build in the the other build's site-packages. >
Am I getting this right: This is experimental, never worked and actually shouldn't even be in openembedded-core master at all? I'm trying to figure out if I'm wasting my time trying to make this work. Bart
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#233779): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/233779 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118277380/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
