On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:22:40PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:46:34AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 10:44 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov via > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > Without DEFAULT_RPROVIDERs for the virtual packages OE behaviour is > > > not deterministic, it's not always obvious, which package will be > > > selected to fulfill the dependency. > > > > Can you be more specific about how it isn't deterministic? We should > > fix that. > > I'm sorry for being not explicit. It is not deterministic if the layer > includes other ICD implementations (meta-qcom, meta-freescale, etc.) > You can point out that it's the layer's reposnsibility to handle > providers in this case. However I think that having a predefined default > would be benefitable (and at least would force those layers to override > those providers instead of depending on the undefined behaviour). > > In particular, I stumbled upon this in meta-qcom when the package > manager (rpm) was happily selecting the Adreno Vulkan ICD just because > it ended up being the first one.
And I was misunderstanding the DEFAULT_RPROVIDERs story. Please ignore this. -- With best wishes Dmitry
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#233825): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/233825 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118480274/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
