On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:44 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 17 mei 2012 om 22:29 heeft Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 13:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> The commit breaks pkgconfig and after discussing it with the kmod and > >>> udev maintainers the conclusion was reached that putting the libraries in > >>> /lib instead of /usr/lib is not supported. > >>> > >>> This reverts commit 6b74f2461735272bd950a4f060dab6e778a36f92. > >> > >> while this is what I had initially it doesn't go well with kmod living in > >> /sbin and accessing libraries from /usr due to our QA checks although > >> I am all for simplifying it where we don't make this check at all. > > > > I've had requests for it along with a commitment to fix it and patches. > > If we decide we don't want this, fine and that will be the case if > > patches are not forthcoming to fix the QA issues. I don't think we've > > reached that point at this with that yet. > > > > I've decided to accept this patch and "unbreak" meta-oe/udev at the > > expense of screwing up OE-Core. I am however still deeply unhappy people > > are trying to bypass OE-Core this way and then "blackmail" OE-Core using > > breaking meta-oe as a reason. The whole systemd thing has been badly > > handled and needs to get fixed properly. > > What does systemd have to do with this?
Why does meta-oe has its own udev recipe? Is systemd related to that at all? > This is about a broken commit breaking udev 182 for over a week. OE-Core worked fine and the commit fixes QA warnings which are now back. > If you have issues with systemd, send patches to meta-oe to fix it. Or > at least bug reports that are more than the insinuations above. I looked in the README and followed that to other README files but couldn't find any indication about what to do with bugs other than write patches which I obviously don't have. When will you be sending the patch to fix the QA warning your revert has introduced? Yes this is a rhetorical question since I've seen your view on this problem previously. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
