Op 18 mei 2012, om 12:29 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:52 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 17 mei 2012, om 23:02 heeft Richard Purdie het vo >> Those QA checks are a joke. I can fix the QA warnings by moving all >> kmod binaries to $bindir or $sbindir since binaries in /usr/bin >> and /usr/bin are exempt from the checks. That would break the >> split /usr case as well. These checks are global as well when they >> only should apply to recipes needed to get /usr mounted. >> >> That's why I consider the current checks misguided and harmfull. As >> seen from the breakage it allows people to break pkgconfig, which >> didn't get picked up by QA checks. And then it turns out that you an >> fix the QA warnings in such a way that it breaks the intent of the >> warnings. > > So we need to improve the QA checks, no argument here.
Would a new, additional check for /lib/pkgconfig/*.pc make sense? > >> But this is all a false dillemma, you could have merged Otavio's patch >> (which I Ack'ed) which supports split /usr and puts the pkgconfig in >> the right place. > > I likely still will but I was worried when he replied saying it still needed > more > testing. I took your reply to the consolidated pull request to refer to > your patch. I was indeed very unspecific there, my apologies. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
