On 05/17/2012 07:58 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 17 mei 2012, om 16:46 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 05/15/2012 06:25 PM, Christopher Larson wrote:
>>> From: Christopher Larson <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> It's common to provide a non-machine-suffixed link in
>>> DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE, so let's be consistent and do so here as well.
>>
>> This of course means that building two machines in the same build
>> dir will result in overwriting the latest non-machine-suffixed
>> link (provided they are the same image type)
>
> Actually it doesn't. At least not on angstrom, shr and slugos:
>
> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-angstrom$ git grep
> DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE conf/distro/include/angstrom.inc:DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE =
> "${DEPLOY_DIR}/images/${MACHINE}"
That seems like a good idea to me. It would make more sense to me for
that to be the default. Having a DISTRO define BUILD policy seems a bit
backwards.
Would anyone object to including ${MACHINE} in the deploy dir by default?
>
> The above was mentioned a few weeks ago, but it looks like no one but
> the distros above and Chris care about proper multimachine builds.
Awe, you were doing so well up until there.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
