On 2026-05-07 18:48, Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
From: Peter Marko<[email protected]>

$ git log --oneline 
ce1013a197eb4a3b8ff2b07e0672f4d0b976ce7c..e9517114acc77c0b8af9da6700107df16882b701
e9517114ac (origin/release/2.43/master) abilist.awk: Handle weak unversioned 
defined symbols
1634cc11a5 Linux: Only define OPEN_TREE_* macros in <sys/mount.h> if undefined 
(bug 33921)
d1d8d27164 include: isolate __O_CLOEXEC flag for sys/mount.h and fcntl.h
8362e8ce10 Use pending character state in IBM1390, IBM1399 character sets 
(CVE-2026-4046)

Testing Results:
+--------------+--------+--------+------+
| Result       | Before | After  | Diff |
+--------------+--------+--------+------+
| PASS         | 6629   | 6632   | +3   |
| XPASS        | 4      | 4      |  0   |
| FAIL         | 105    | 103    | -2   |
| XFAIL        | 16     | 16     |  0   |
| UNSUPPORTED  | 559    | 559    |  0   |
+--------------+--------+--------+------+

Changes in failed testcases:
malloc/tst-malloc-fork-deadlock-malloc-check  FAIL  PASS
malloc/tst-malloc-too-large-malloc-check      PASS  FAIL

From patch review meeting, we're going to merge this but I have the following question:

It's a little odd that his failed.

Is the failure reproducible?

Sundeep, can someone on the team reproduce these results
and if the failure also happens for them explain and fix the issue?

Thanks for the update Peter.

../Randy
nptl/tst-getpid3                              FAIL  PASS
stdlib/tst-qsort3                             FAIL  PASS

Signed-off-by: Peter Marko<[email protected]>
---
  meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +-
  meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.43.bb     | 4 +++-
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc 
b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
index 015e7943c5..af3db54cee 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.43/master"
  PV = "2.43+git"
-SRCREV_glibc ?= "ce1013a197eb4a3b8ff2b07e0672f4d0b976ce7c"
+SRCREV_glibc ?= "e9517114acc77c0b8af9da6700107df16882b701"
  SRCREV_localedef ?= "cba02c503d7c853a38ccfb83c57e343ca5ecd7e5"
GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git;protocol=https" diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.43.bb b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.43.bb index ffc17eb072..b84c55ca17 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.43.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.43.bb @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ Allows for ASLR bypass so can bypass some hardening, not an exploit in itself, m easier access for another. 'ASLR bypass itself is not a vulnerability.'" CVE_STATUS_GROUPS += "CVE_STATUS_STABLE_BACKPORTS"
-CVE_STATUS_STABLE_BACKPORTS = "CVE-2025-15281 CVE-2026-0861 CVE-2026-0915 
CVE-2026-4437 CVE-2026-4438"
+CVE_STATUS_STABLE_BACKPORTS = "CVE-2025-15281 CVE-2026-0861 CVE-2026-0915 
CVE-2026-4437 CVE-2026-4438 \
+    CVE-2026-4046 \
+"
  CVE_STATUS_STABLE_BACKPORTS[status] = "cpe-stable-backport: fix available in used 
git hash"
DEPENDS += "gperf-native bison-native"




--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#236821): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/236821
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119206065/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to