Pick patch from [1] also mentioned at Debian report in [2] [1] https://github.com/golang/go/commit/edc1e4a5f2af48b648502d987b8d4eebf43c884b [2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-32280 [3] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32280
Signed-off-by: Hitendra Prajapati <[email protected]> --- meta/recipes-devtools/go/go-1.22.12.inc | 1 + .../go/go/CVE-2026-32280.patch | 294 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 295 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/go/go/CVE-2026-32280.patch diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go-1.22.12.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go-1.22.12.inc index 03437f0358..5753243f0e 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go-1.22.12.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go-1.22.12.inc @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ SRC_URI += "\ file://CVE-2026-27140.patch \ file://CVE-2026-27143.patch \ file://CVE-2026-27144.patch \ + file://CVE-2026-32280.patch \ " SRC_URI[main.sha256sum] = "012a7e1f37f362c0918c1dfa3334458ac2da1628c4b9cf4d9ca02db986e17d71" diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go/CVE-2026-32280.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go/CVE-2026-32280.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..30af4cf2ab --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/go/go/CVE-2026-32280.patch @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@ +From edc1e4a5f2af48b648502d987b8d4eebf43c884b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Roland Shoemaker <[email protected]> +Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:28:44 -0800 +Subject: [PATCH] [release-branch.go1.25] crypto/x509: fix signature checking + limit + +We added the "is this cert already in the chain" check (alreadyInChain) +to considerCandidates before the signature limit. considerCandidates +bails out when we exceed the signature check, but buildChains keeps +calling considerCandidates until it exhausts all potential parents. In +the case where a large number of certificates look to have signed each +other (e.g. all have subject==issuerSubject and the same key), +alreadyInChain is not particularly cheap, meaning even though we hit our +"this is too much work" limit, we still do a lot of work. + +Move alreadyInChain after the signature limit, and also return a +sentinel error, and check it in buildChains so we can break out of the +loop early if we aren't actually going to do any more work. + +Thanks to Jakub Ciolek for reporting this issue. + +Updates #78282 +Fixes #78361 +Fixes CVE-2026-32280 + +Change-Id: Ie6f05c6ba3b0a40c21f64f7c4f846e74fae3b10e +Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/758320 +Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <[email protected]> +Reviewed-by: Neal Patel <[email protected]> +LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <[email protected]> +Reviewed-by: Jakub Ciolek <[email protected]> +(cherry picked from commit 26d8a902002a2b41bc4c302044110f2eae8d597f) +Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/759221 +Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <[email protected]> + +CVE: CVE-2026-32280 +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/golang/go/commit/edc1e4a5f2af48b648502d987b8d4eebf43c884b] +Signed-off-by: Hitendra Prajapati <[email protected]> +--- + src/crypto/x509/verify.go | 31 ++++--- + src/crypto/x509/verify_test.go | 150 ++++++++++++++++----------------- + 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/src/crypto/x509/verify.go b/src/crypto/x509/verify.go +index 0ae8aef..1de06bc 100644 +--- a/src/crypto/x509/verify.go ++++ b/src/crypto/x509/verify.go +@@ -939,6 +939,8 @@ func alreadyInChain(candidate *Certificate, chain []*Certificate) bool { + // for failed checks due to different intermediates having the same Subject. + const maxChainSignatureChecks = 100 + ++var errSignatureLimit = errors.New("x509: signature check attempts limit reached while verifying certificate chain") ++ + func (c *Certificate) buildChains(currentChain []*Certificate, sigChecks *int, opts *VerifyOptions) (chains [][]*Certificate, err error) { + var ( + hintErr error +@@ -946,16 +948,16 @@ func (c *Certificate) buildChains(currentChain []*Certificate, sigChecks *int, o + ) + + considerCandidate := func(certType int, candidate potentialParent) { +- if candidate.cert.PublicKey == nil || alreadyInChain(candidate.cert, currentChain) { +- return +- } +- + if sigChecks == nil { + sigChecks = new(int) + } + *sigChecks++ + if *sigChecks > maxChainSignatureChecks { +- err = errors.New("x509: signature check attempts limit reached while verifying certificate chain") ++ err = errSignatureLimit ++ return ++ } ++ ++ if candidate.cert.PublicKey == nil || alreadyInChain(candidate.cert, currentChain) { + return + } + +@@ -996,11 +998,20 @@ func (c *Certificate) buildChains(currentChain []*Certificate, sigChecks *int, o + } + } + +- for _, root := range opts.Roots.findPotentialParents(c) { +- considerCandidate(rootCertificate, root) +- } +- for _, intermediate := range opts.Intermediates.findPotentialParents(c) { +- considerCandidate(intermediateCertificate, intermediate) ++candidateLoop: ++ for _, parents := range []struct { ++ certType int ++ potentials []potentialParent ++ }{ ++ {rootCertificate, opts.Roots.findPotentialParents(c)}, ++ {intermediateCertificate, opts.Intermediates.findPotentialParents(c)}, ++ } { ++ for _, parent := range parents.potentials { ++ considerCandidate(parents.certType, parent) ++ if err == errSignatureLimit { ++ break candidateLoop ++ } ++ } + } + + if len(chains) > 0 { +diff --git a/src/crypto/x509/verify_test.go b/src/crypto/x509/verify_test.go +index 223c250..f3711ac 100644 +--- a/src/crypto/x509/verify_test.go ++++ b/src/crypto/x509/verify_test.go +@@ -1765,10 +1765,13 @@ func TestValidHostname(t *testing.T) { + } + } + +-func generateCert(cn string, isCA bool, issuer *Certificate, issuerKey crypto.PrivateKey) (*Certificate, crypto.PrivateKey, error) { +- priv, err := ecdsa.GenerateKey(elliptic.P256(), rand.Reader) +- if err != nil { +- return nil, nil, err ++func generateCert(cn string, isCA bool, issuer *Certificate, issuerKey crypto.PrivateKey, priv crypto.PrivateKey) (*Certificate, crypto.PrivateKey, error) { ++ if priv == nil { ++ var err error ++ priv, err = ecdsa.GenerateKey(elliptic.P256(), rand.Reader) ++ if err != nil { ++ return nil, nil, err ++ } + } + + serialNumberLimit := new(big.Int).Lsh(big.NewInt(1), 128) +@@ -1779,6 +1782,7 @@ func generateCert(cn string, isCA bool, issuer *Certificate, issuerKey crypto.Pr + Subject: pkix.Name{CommonName: cn}, + NotBefore: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour), + NotAfter: time.Now().Add(24 * time.Hour), ++ DNSNames: []string{rand.Text()}, + + KeyUsage: KeyUsageKeyEncipherment | KeyUsageDigitalSignature | KeyUsageCertSign, + ExtKeyUsage: []ExtKeyUsage{ExtKeyUsageServerAuth}, +@@ -1790,7 +1794,7 @@ func generateCert(cn string, isCA bool, issuer *Certificate, issuerKey crypto.Pr + issuerKey = priv + } + +- derBytes, err := CreateCertificate(rand.Reader, template, issuer, priv.Public(), issuerKey) ++ derBytes, err := CreateCertificate(rand.Reader, template, issuer, priv.(crypto.Signer).Public(), issuerKey) + if err != nil { + return nil, nil, err + } +@@ -1802,81 +1806,77 @@ func generateCert(cn string, isCA bool, issuer *Certificate, issuerKey crypto.Pr + return cert, priv, nil + } + +-func TestPathologicalChain(t *testing.T) { +- if testing.Short() { +- t.Skip("skipping generation of a long chain of certificates in short mode") +- } +- +- // Build a chain where all intermediates share the same subject, to hit the +- // path building worst behavior. +- roots, intermediates := NewCertPool(), NewCertPool() +- +- parent, parentKey, err := generateCert("Root CA", true, nil, nil) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } +- roots.AddCert(parent) +- +- for i := 1; i < 100; i++ { +- parent, parentKey, err = generateCert("Intermediate CA", true, parent, parentKey) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } +- intermediates.AddCert(parent) +- } +- +- leaf, _, err := generateCert("Leaf", false, parent, parentKey) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } +- +- start := time.Now() +- _, err = leaf.Verify(VerifyOptions{ +- Roots: roots, +- Intermediates: intermediates, +- }) +- t.Logf("verification took %v", time.Since(start)) +- +- if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "signature check attempts limit") { +- t.Errorf("expected verification to fail with a signature checks limit error; got %v", err) +- } +-} +- +-func TestLongChain(t *testing.T) { ++func TestPathologicalChains(t *testing.T) { + if testing.Short() { +- t.Skip("skipping generation of a long chain of certificates in short mode") +- } +- +- roots, intermediates := NewCertPool(), NewCertPool() +- +- parent, parentKey, err := generateCert("Root CA", true, nil, nil) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } +- roots.AddCert(parent) ++ t.Skip("skipping generation of a long chains of certificates in short mode") ++ } ++ ++ // Test four pathological cases, where the intermediates in the chain have ++ // the same/different subjects and the same/different keys. This covers a ++ // number of cases where the chain building algorithm might be inefficient, ++ // such as when there are many intermediates with the same subject but ++ // different keys, many intermediates with the same key but different ++ // subjects, many intermediates with the same subject and key, or many ++ // intermediates with different subjects and keys. ++ // ++ // The worst case for our algorithm is when all of the intermediates share ++ // both subject and key, in which case all of the intermediates appear to ++ // have signed each other, causing us to see a large number of potential ++ // parents for each intermediate. ++ // ++ // All of these cases, Certificate.Verify should return errSignatureLimit. ++ // ++ // In all cases, don't have a root in the pool, so a valid chain cannot actually be built. ++ ++ for _, test := range []struct { ++ sameSubject bool ++ sameKey bool ++ }{ ++ {sameSubject: false, sameKey: false}, ++ {sameSubject: true, sameKey: false}, ++ {sameSubject: false, sameKey: true}, ++ {sameSubject: true, sameKey: true}, ++ } { ++ t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("sameSubject=%t,sameKey=%t", test.sameSubject, test.sameKey), func(t *testing.T) { ++ intermediates := NewCertPool() ++ ++ var intermediateKey crypto.PrivateKey ++ if test.sameKey { ++ var err error ++ intermediateKey, err = ecdsa.GenerateKey(elliptic.P256(), rand.Reader) ++ if err != nil { ++ t.Fatal(err) ++ } ++ } + +- for i := 1; i < 15; i++ { +- name := fmt.Sprintf("Intermediate CA #%d", i) +- parent, parentKey, err = generateCert(name, true, parent, parentKey) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } +- intermediates.AddCert(parent) +- } ++ var leafSigner crypto.PrivateKey ++ var intermediate *Certificate ++ for i := range 100 { ++ cn := "Intermediate CA" ++ if !test.sameSubject { ++ cn += fmt.Sprintf(" #%d", i) ++ } ++ var err error ++ intermediate, leafSigner, err = generateCert(cn, true, intermediate, leafSigner, intermediateKey) ++ if err != nil { ++ t.Fatal(err) ++ } ++ intermediates.AddCert(intermediate) ++ } + +- leaf, _, err := generateCert("Leaf", false, parent, parentKey) +- if err != nil { +- t.Fatal(err) +- } ++ leaf, _, err := generateCert("Leaf", false, intermediate, leafSigner, nil) ++ if err != nil { ++ t.Fatal(err) ++ } + +- start := time.Now() +- if _, err := leaf.Verify(VerifyOptions{ +- Roots: roots, +- Intermediates: intermediates, +- }); err != nil { +- t.Error(err) ++ start := time.Now() ++ _, err = leaf.Verify(VerifyOptions{ ++ Roots: NewCertPool(), ++ Intermediates: intermediates, ++ }) ++ t.Logf("verification took %v", time.Since(start)) ++ }) + } +- t.Logf("verification took %v", time.Since(start)) + } + + func TestSystemRootsError(t *testing.T) { +-- +2.50.1 + -- 2.50.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#236881): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/236881 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119273195/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
