On Tue, 2026-05-12 at 21:04 +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt via 
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> This is my proposed solution for groupmems' lack of support for the
> --prefix option
> (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16277), and the fact
> that groupmems will be removed in the next version of shadow.
> 
> The first three commits make a little bit of clean-up to
> useradd.bbclass and then add the support for USERMOD_PARAM. These I
> would like to see backported to Wrynose. While technically it is a new
> feature, I hope this can be accepted (it should not affect anyone who
> does not actively start using it). It would make it a lot easier for us 
> and others who are using GROUPMEMS_PARAM today (we have more than 300
> recipes that will need to be updated) as it would then be possible to
> migrate the recipes over some time rather than having to do a flag day 
> rewrite.

I appreciate the patch series, thanks for doing that. I'm much less
happy that this is marked as "something we must backport" and then the
series starts with a patch mixing whitespace and "simplifications".

Whilst I appreciate it would make it easier for you, you're breaking
several different elements of the stable backport policies and hence
actually actively make it harder to make case to backport it. It
certainly doesn't make it easier for me, quite the opposite.

Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#236912): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/236912
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119284990/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to