(while this is from meta-security layer, it's a more general
question about how a packagegroup assigns a value for SUMMARY).

  building an image that includes packagegroup-security-tpm2.bb:

https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-security/tree/meta-tpm/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-security-tpm2.bb?h=wrynose

and getting the warning:

"WARNING: packagegroup-security-tpm2-1.0-r0 do_recipe_qa: QA Issue:
Recipe packagegroup-security-tpm2 in
/home/rpjday/Layers/repo/wrynose-next/layers/meta-security/meta-tpm/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-security-tpm2.bb
does not contain a SUMMARY. Please add an entry. [missing-metadata]"

  here's the rather odd content from that packagegroup recipe file:

    PACKAGE_ARCH = "${TUNE_PKGARCH}"

    inherit packagegroup

    PACKAGES = "${PN}"

    SUMMARY:packagegroup-security-tpm2 = "Security TPM 2.0 support"
    RDEPENDS:packagegroup-security-tpm2 = " \
        tpm2-tools \
        ... snip ...

this seems overly complicated since the packagegroup doesn't define
any sub-packagegroups, so the "PACKAGES =" line seems superfluous, as
does the override usage for SUMMARY.

  but why should this generate the warning above? is there something
odd about the way this packagegroup is being defined?

rday

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#237669): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/237669
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119512778/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to