From: Peter Marko <[email protected]> Including image in another image is being done by depending on do_image_complete. This however does not include SPDX SBOM. We should not need second bitbake execution to create it.
Recursively add do_create_image_sbom_spdx to do_build to resolve it. Use-case are e.g. fitimage or multiconfig containers. Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <[email protected]> --- meta/classes-recipe/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass index 15a91e90e2..4d6a6424fe 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ do_create_image_sbom_spdx[stamp-extra-info] = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" do_create_image_sbom_spdx[cleandirs] = "${SPDXIMAGEDEPLOYDIR}" do_create_image_sbom_spdx[recrdeptask] += "do_create_recipe_spdx do_create_spdx do_create_package_spdx" do_create_image_sbom_spdx[file-checksums] += "${SPDX3_DEP_FILES}" +do_build[recrdeptask] += "do_create_image_sbom_spdx" python do_create_image_sbom_spdx_setscene() { sstate_setscene(d)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#238291): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/238291 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119721184/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
