From: Peter Marko <[email protected]> cve-check class was removed, so this check is obsolete.
>From commit message introducing vex class it's not clear why this check is present, but presumably to not extend the cve status multiple times. Thas is no longer possible since commit 45e18f4270d084d81c21b1e5a4a601ce975d8a77 introduced sanity check to prevent that from happening. Therefore it's also not necessary to rewrite this check to new sbom-cve-check(-recipe) classes. Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <[email protected]> --- meta/classes/vex.bbclass | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/vex.bbclass b/meta/classes/vex.bbclass index 71be705fc1..b3c2aca762 100644 --- a/meta/classes/vex.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/vex.bbclass @@ -73,9 +73,6 @@ CVE_CHECK_LAYER_INCLUDELIST ??= "" CVE_VERSION_SUFFIX ??= "" python () { - if bb.data.inherits_class("cve-check", d): - raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("Skipping recipe: found incompatible combination of cve-check and vex enabled at the same time.") - from oe.cve_check import extend_cve_status extend_cve_status(d) }
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#238957): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/238957 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119839279/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
