On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 07:00 AM, Ross Burton wrote: > > Hi Andrew, Mingli, > > >> On 16 Jun 2026, at 21:50, Andrew Geissler via lists.openembedded.org >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The move to qemu 11 and the enforcement of 64 bit machines broke ppc64le >> machines. Add ppc64le wherever there is a ppc64 machine. > > Interestingly this patch from Andrew conflicts with a patch from Mingli Yu > which changes ppc64 to powerpc64[1]. > > Without triple-checking I’m more liable to believe your patch as I expect > that you’re actually running PPC64LE servers (and also touches more places > where COMPATIBLE_HOST is set), but I’m also wondering what Mingli’s patch > is doing because it must have been sent for a reason. > > Can you both compare each-others patches so we can understand what > happened? > > Cheers, > Ross > > [1] "qemu: Correct the ppc64 setting in COMPATIBLE_HOST”, > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/238884 >
Yep I tested my patch on our POWER9 ppc64le based machine and verified it allowed me to build the latest OpenBMC distro. I submitted this patch because our CI process that utilizes a ppc64le stopped working when we picked up the latest oe-core in OpenBMC. I poked around a bit and when I look at a POWER server that not running in little endian mode, I don't actually see ppc64 or powerpc64 from Mingli patch. As far as I can tell it's just powerpc (uname -p). So I don't have a lot vested in the non-ppc64le portion. If Mingli can confirm it tested fine for their config then I'm good if we just merge both patches, otherwise please merge mine at least :) Andrew
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#239304): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/239304 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119840793/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
