Le mer. 1 juil. 2026, 08:51, Roland Kovács <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> On Tue, 2026-06-30 at 15:19 +0200, Yoann Congal wrote:
> > On Tue Jun 30, 2026 at 3:03 PM CEST, Roland Kovács via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > Bug fixes included in this release:
> > >    - gpg: Fix wrong assertion failure which could very rarely occur
> > >      during key signature checking.  [rG693f5642f6]
> > >    - gpg: Consider certify-only keys for revocation signature check.
> > >      [T8196]
> > >    - gpgsm: Fix possible double free in the CMS parser.  [T8240]
> > >    - gpgsm: Fix possible too early removal of ephemeral keys.  [T8236]
> > >    - gpgsm: Avoid emitting a final FAILURE status line if --status-fd
> > >      is not used.  [rG69c27fe377]
> > >    - gpgsm: Fix a regression in 2.5.19 for password encrypted GCM
> > >      data.  [rG60a823c97b]
> > >    - agent: Fix not using cache for pinentry loopback.  [rGd4b608a31f]
> > >    - agent: Fix command PUT_SECRET by saving input line.
> [rG1875bc185e]
> > >    - keyboxd: Mark keys searched but not imported via LDAP correctly
> > >      as ephemeral.  [T8048]
> > >    - scdaemon: Avoid buffer overflow with SC-HSM cards providing RSA
> > >      keys > 2k.  [T8244]
> > >    - dirmngr: Fix uninitialized use of the dns_any union in
> > >      dns_rr_cmp.  [T8251]
> > >  Release-info: https://dev.gnupg.org/T7997
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roland Kovacs <[email protected]>
> >
> > Sorry but that URL also contains:
> > > New and extended features:
> > >  gpgsm: Implement GCM encryption. Note that decryption works since
> > >         version 2.3.2. [T3979]
> > >  gpgsm: New option --attribute and server command SETATTR to include
> > >         arbitrary signed or unsigned attributes into a signature.
> > >         Enabled only with libksba 1.7.0 or later. [T4537]
> > >  gpgsm: Introduce system attribute _signingCertificateV2.
> [rG0335a9cb04]
> > ... which are new features, and thus, that upgrade is not acceptable for
> > stable branches.
> >
> Understood. Just for clarification, only bug fix release is accepted for
> stable branch, even if
> there's no backwards incompatible change?
>

Yes, that's right. No new features, no enhancement, only bug/security fixes.


> I'll remove the recipe update and only keep the CVE fix in V2.
>

Sounds good, thanks!

>



> > > ---
> > >  .../recipes-support/gnupg/{gnupg_2.5.17.bb => gnupg_2.5.20.bb} | 3
> ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  rename meta/recipes-support/gnupg/{gnupg_2.5.17.bb => gnupg_2.5.20.bb}
> (95%)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.17.bb
> b/meta/recipes-
> > > support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.20.bb
> > > similarity index 95%
> > > rename from meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.17.bb
> > > rename to meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.20.bb
> > > index fd6588769c..a1a50e2384 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.17.bb
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.5.20.bb
> > > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ inherit autotools gettext texinfo pkgconfig
> upstream-version-is-even
> > >  require drop-unknown-suffix.inc
> > >
> > >  UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "https://gnupg.org/ftp/gcrypt/gnupg/";
> > > +SRCREV = "343d0cb8910441aa44c56ce8673a78e137040c87"
> > >  SRC_URI = "${GNUPG_MIRROR}/${BPN}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
> > >             file://0002-use-pkgconfig-instead-of-npth-config.patch \
> > >             file://0001-Woverride-init-is-not-needed-with-gcc-9.patch \
> > > @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ SRC_URI:append:class-native = "
> > > file://0001-configure.ac-use-a-custom-value-for-
> > >                                  file://relocate.patch"
> > >  SRC_URI:append:class-nativesdk = " file://relocate.patch"
> > >
> > > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "2c1fbe20e2958fd8fb53cf37d7c38e84a900edc0d561a1c4af4bc3a10888685d"
> > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "6461266e99c308419a379abe6c356d54c214136c4589bd65951091138989ffc6"
> > >
> > >  EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-ldap \
> > >             --disable-ccid-driver \
> >
>
> Cheers,
>         Roland
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#239947): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/239947
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120046225/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to