It has lain there for a while, obscuring certain aspects of how task signatures are calculated.
This changeset does not change the current status quo, but rather changes the way in which it is implemented. It can be followed by changes which further refine what is excluded and how, from those tasks which refer to 'extend_recipe_sysroot'. Related discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/aa893eb861bf4dd18e3e84e6bbebdee3b0367d1b.ca...@linuxfoundation.org/ Signed-off-by: Adam Blank <[email protected]> --- Changes in v2: - Leave the mechanism in effect, but move it to the staging class - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] --- Adam Blank (6): staging: add 'extend_recipe_sysroot' to 'vardepsexclude' cross: add 'extend_recipe_sysroot' to 'vardepsexclude' native: add 'extend_recipe_sysroot' to 'vardepsexclude' wic-tool: add 'extend_recipe_sysroot' to 'vardepsexclude' gcc-runtime: add 'extend_recipe_sysroot' to 'vardepsexclude' bitbake.conf: remove 'extend_recipe_sysroot' from BB_HASHEXCLUDE_COMMON meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass | 3 ++- meta/classes-recipe/cross.bbclass | 1 + meta/classes-recipe/native.bbclass | 1 + meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +- meta/recipes-core/meta/wic-tools.bb | 1 + meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc | 1 + 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 171af3b2915dd076c8d1b205ff75eac1ebd5a586 change-id: 20260418-extend_recipe_sysroot-d958ba9cfa9a Best regards, -- Adam Blank <[email protected]>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#241258): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/241258 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120331179/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
