On Mon Jul 20, 2026 at 5:09 PM CEST, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 7/4/26 11:55 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Hello one more time, > >>>>>> I guess, before this patch can be applied, this one (or a back- >>>>>> port of >>>>>> it) is required: >>>>>> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/? >>>>>> id=85e0408a81bdca0411a8625061e5e343c05f92d9 >>>>>> Otherwise, the oe-selftest fail. >>>>> Thank you for staying vigilant. >>>>> >>>>> Yoann, can you please pick the aforementioned commit too ? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your help ! >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I missed that discussion, sorry. But was reminded by Ryan (thanks). >>>> >>>> If I understood correclty, the set of patches we need for wrynose is: >>>> * kernel-fit-image.bbclass: Do not include kernel property in DTBO >>>> config subnodes >>>> * kernel-fit-image.bbclass: Fix operation with KERNEL_DTBVENDORED = >>>> "1" >>>> * oe-selftest: fitimage: Do not expect kernel property in DTBO config >>>> subnodes >>>> * kernel-fit-image: Add KERNEL_DTBVENDORED support for >>>> FIT_CONF_DEFAULT_DTB (this one is not merged on master yet) >>>> >>>> Marek, Adrian, Ryan: does that sound correct? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, that's correct. One little detail is the order of the patches. If >>> you pick the oe-selftest commit first, all commits are compile and >>> test-able. That's my suggestion: >>> >>> * oe-selftest: fitimage: Do not expect kernel property in DTBO config >>> subnodes >> >> This is [1]. >> >>> * kernel-fit-image.bbclass: Do not include kernel property in DTBO >>> config subnodes >> >> This is [2]. >> >>> * kernel-fit-image.bbclass: Fix operation with KERNEL_DTBVENDORED = >>> "1" >> >> This is [3]. >> >>> * kernel-fit-image: Add KERNEL_DTBVENDORED support for >>> FIT_CONF_DEFAULT_DTB (this one is not merged on master yet) >> >> This is still not even in master-next . >> >>> same order as on master branch. >> >> Thank you for your help ! >> >> [1] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/ >> patch/[email protected]/ >> [2] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/ >> patch/[email protected]/ >> [3] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/ >> patch/[email protected]/ > > Do you think those three backports can be picked up for OE wrynose ? > > Thank you for your help !
Sure! They even are in the branch I sent for review: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Following Paul's review, I will most likely hold it for one cycle in order to merge the test at the same time. See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Regards, -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#241411): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/241411 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120043543/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
