On Tue Jul 21, 2026 at 4:37 PM CEST, Jaipaul Cheernam via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > HI, > > This is a version upgrade (5.42.2 → 5.44.0), not a CVE backport patch. > > The CVE tag format check is triggering because the commit removes existing > CVE patch files that are now included upstream. > > Should I extract all CVEs fixed between 5.42.2 and 5.44.0 from the upstream > changelog and add formal CVE: CVE-YYYY-XXXX tags for each in the commit > message?
No, this is a patchtest false-positive. You can ignore it. Regards, > Regards, > Jaipaul Cheernam > > 🔗 EST Website<https://www.est.tech/> > 🔗 EST LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ericsson-software-technology/> > > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> on behalf of Patchtest via > lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 16:03 > To: Jaipaul Cheernam <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > Subject: [OE-core] Patchtest results for [PATCH] perl: upgrade 5.42.2 -> > 5.44.0 > > Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one > or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for > more information: > > --- > Testing patch /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/perl-upgrade-5.42.2---5.44.0.patch > > FAIL: test CVE tag format: Missing or incorrectly formatted CVE tag in patch > file. Correct or include the CVE tag in the patch with format: "CVE: > CVE-YYYY-XXXX" (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format) -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#241551): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/241551 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120377062/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
