On 05/30/2012 01:30 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Robert Yang<[email protected]>  wrote:
Replace os.popen with subprocess.Popen since the older function would
fail (more or less) silently if the executed program cannot be found

More info:
http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess-replacements

[YOCTO #2454]

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang<[email protected]>
---
  scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py |    3 ++-
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py 
b/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
index 7b43137..d139ab1 100755
--- a/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
+++ b/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
  import os
  import sys
  import time
+import subprocess

  VERSION = "2.7.2"

@@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ class MakefileMaker:
  if __name__ == "__main__":

     if len( sys.argv )>  1:
-        os.popen( "rm -f ./%s" % sys.argv[1] )
+        subprocess.Popen("rm -f ./%s" % sys.argv[1], shell=True, 
stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout
         outfile = file( sys.argv[1], "w" )
     else:
         outfile = sys.stdout

This seems like a candidate for subprocess.call, not subprocess.Popen,
as the output isn't used. Better yet, just use os.unlink() and ignore
exceptions from it.

Thanks, Chris, I will send the V2 sooner.

// Robert




_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to