On 5 Aug 2026, at 02:08, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > None of these caveats are relevant to u-boot and clang versions we use isn't > it? > so it seems to be workaround for some issue that is now brought forth which > was > latent before ? if so, why not fix that
Almost definitely not, but the immediate fix of restoring the original behaviour (always builds with gcc, even when TOOLCHAIN=clang) was provably a quick fix that could be merged. I filed a bug for myself to do the work so that the uboot recipe actually respects TOOLCHAIN. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#242849): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/242849 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120591917/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
