On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:00:04 -0700
Christopher Larson <[email protected]> wrote:

> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[i586] = "-msgxx-glibc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[i686] = "-msgxx-glibc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[core2] = "-msgxx-glibc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[x86] = "-msgxx-glibc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[x86-64] = "-msgxx-glibc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[ppce500] = "-te500v1"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[ppce500mc] = "-te500mc"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[ppce500v2] = "-te500v2"
> +CSL_MULTILIB_ARGS[ppce600] = "-te600"

I would suggest that these be ?= assignments.

Rationale:  There is more than one Sourcery toolchain out there, and
they sometimes differ in these.  It'd be nice if a hypothetical vendor
using a hypothetical custom variant of the Sourcery toolchain could use
these configuration files with nothing more than a few variable
assignments.  :)

I do quite like the cleanup.

-s
-- 
Listen, get this.  Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to