On Fri Sep 18, 2026 at 10:03 AM CEST, Joao Marcos Costa via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Hello, folks > > On 9/9/26 7:03 PM, João Marcos Costa wrote: >> When ARCHIVER_MODE[src] is set to "original", a tarball is generated with >> the unpacked sources of a given recipe. Prior to it, a tmpdir >> (i.e. from tempfile.mkdtemp()) is created and the sources are unpacked >> inside: >> >> (...)/vim/9.2.0340/archiver-work/tmp8pu2nsck >> `-- vim-9.2.0340 >> |-- READMEdir >> |-- ci >> |-- lang >> >> This tmpdir, however, ends up being shipped in the deployed tarball: >> >> $ tar -tf vim-9.2.0340-r0.tar.xz >> (...) >> tmp8pu2nsck/vim-9.2.0340/ci/config.mk.clang-12.sed >> tmp8pu2nsck/vim-9.2.0340/LICENSE >> tmp8pu2nsck/vim-9.2.0340/.git-blame-ignore-revs >> (...) >> >> This can be avoided by pointing to the subdir where the sources are >> unpacked, rather than to tmpdir, when calling create_tarball(). >> >> The subdir's name can be inferred from 'BP', so we will use >> 'tmp8pu2nsck/vim-9.2.0340/.' instead of 'tmp8pu2nsck/.' as input. >> >> e.g. and in the result: >> >> ./ >> ./vim-9.2.0304/ >> ./vim-9.2.0304/SECURITY.md >> ./vim-9.2.0304/.codecov.yml >> (...) >> >> Signed-off-by: João Marcos Costa <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/classes/archiver.bbclass | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass >> index b274c53e79..c824718a1d 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass >> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ python do_ar_original() { >> else: >> bb.fatal("Cannot determine archive names for >> original source because 'name=' URL parameter '%s' is used twice. Make it >> unique in: %s %s" % (tarball_suffix[name], url)) >> tarball_suffix[name] = url >> - create_tarball(d, tmpdir + '/.', name, ar_outdir) >> + create_tarball(d, os.path.join(tmpdir, d.getVar('BP'), '.'), >> name, ar_outdir) >> >> # Emit patch series files for 'original' >> bb.note('Writing patch series files...') > > Gentle ping: would there by any updates on this one? > Thanks!
Hello João, I think there was a mail issue with the patch, it is not on lore (and, so, invisible to patchwork and most tools): https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > [parent not found: <[email protected]>] I think you should RESEND it. Regards, -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#246196): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/246196 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121311198/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
