On Thu, 2026-09-17 at 13:36 +0530, Sana Kazi via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > From: Sana Kazi <[email protected]> > > Set LICENSE for libgcrypt-dbg as "LGPL-2.1-or-later" > as the files used in dbg package use LGPL-2.1-or-later. > > Signed-off-by: Sana Kazi <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_1.12.4.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_1.12.4.bb > b/meta/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_1.12.4.bb > index 1b2b1dc13b..27b9d7fa15 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_1.12.4.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_1.12.4.bb > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SECTION = "libs" > LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later" > LICENSE:${PN} = "BSD-3-Clause AND LGPL-2.1-or-later" > LICENSE:${PN}-dev = "GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later" > +LICENSE:${PN}-dbg = "LGPL-2.1-or-later" > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=570a9b3749dd0463a1778803b12a6dce \ > file://COPYING.LIB;md5=4bf661c1e3793e55c8d1051bc5e0ae21 \
How are you deciding that none of the files in the -dbg package are under just that license? The cipher/sha* files are likely a issue on at least some architectures at the very least? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#246356): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/246356 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121292555/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
