On 06/11/2012 08:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Saul Wold<[email protected]> wrote:
Folks,
We recently had a spat of new patches added without patch headers, ie no
patch comment, Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status.
Please review this list and update the patch and submit a new commit.
Zhai Edwin -
meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango-1.28.4/multilib-fix-clean.patch
Laurentiu Palcu -
meta/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/libdirect-remove-include-of-linux-config.h.patch
Cristian Iorga -
meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/fix_building_fom_archive.patch
Xiaofeng Yan - meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch
Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-resolvedep.patch
Andreas Müller -
meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap/runtime-staprun-configure.ac-support-without-nss-for.patch
Bruce Ashfield -
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-modules/lttng-sycalls-protect-is_compat_task-from-redefiniti.patch
Your script is wrong here. That patch has everything you'd expect,
since it follows kernel
patch conventions. Subject, shortlog, log log and sign-off.
So don't expect any resubmission from me on this one, since I won't be
putting an upstream
status directly in the patch.
This is a patch in OE-Core, not in the kernel, there is no reason you
can't update this patch to include the Upstream-Status:? What is the
status of this patch anyway? Is it a backport?
Sau!
Bruce
Thanks
--
Sau!
Saul Wold
Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
Yocto Project / Poky Build System
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
