Passing --initial-rev to update-recipe or finish currently has no effect: the recorded initial revision is skipped as intended, but the override is never stored in its place. For recipes without submodules this leaves no initial revision at all, and the command fails with an error asking the user to pass --initial-rev.
Seed initial_revs with the override before parsing the bbappend so it takes precedence again. Recorded values are still used for submodules and when no override is given. AI-Generated: Uses Claude (claude-fable-5) Signed-off-by: Babanpreet Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 62abb60b899e63ea6db5c745f4b1b6af0d4b40f1) Signed-off-by: Babanpreet Singh <[email protected]> --- scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py b/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py index 42fb13872d..e2f5c28f8b 100644 --- a/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py +++ b/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py @@ -1200,6 +1200,10 @@ def _get_patchset_revs(srctree, recipe_path, initial_rev=None, force_patch_refre commits = {} patches = [] initial_revs = {} + if initial_rev: + # A user-specified override applies to the main repo ("."); the + # parse loop below leaves it in place of the recorded value + initial_revs["."] = initial_rev with open(recipe_path, 'r') as f: for line in f: pattern = r'^#\s.*\s(.*):\s([0-9a-fA-F]+)$' -- 2.43.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#247056): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/247056 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121539824/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
