On Fri Oct 2, 2026 at 2:45 PM CEST, Peter Marko wrote:
> We should upgrade python version instead of picking patches included in 
> latest tag.
> https://github.com/python/cpython/releases/tag/v3.12.15

Agreed.

@João, python is one of the rare recipes we'd rather upgrade than patch
with backports on stable. As long as it is maintained upstream, of
course.

>
> I'll probably give it a try over weekend.

Thanks Peter!

>
> Peter
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] <openembedded-
>> [email protected]> On Behalf Of Joao Marcos Costa via
>> lists.openembedded.org
>> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2026 2:40 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; João Marcos Costa
>> (Schneider Electric) <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [OE-core] [scarthgap][PATCH] python3: fix CVE-2026-19445
>> 
>> From: João Marcos Costa (Schneider Electric) <[email protected]>
>> 
>> This critical vulnerability [1] was fixed originally on 3.14, and then 
>> backported to
>> 3.12 through a PR (already merged) [2]:
>> 
>> "[3.12] gh-156293: Use-after-free for server-side SSLContext with 
>> sni_callback"
>> 
>> Backport the fix to oe-core's v3.12.14.
>> 
>> [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-19445
>> [2] https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/158517
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: João Marcos Costa (Schneider Electric)
>> <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  .../python/python3/CVE-2026-19445.patch       | 265 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../python/python3_3.12.14.bb                 |   1 +
>>  2 files changed, 266 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/CVE-2026-
>> 19445.patch

-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#247121): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/247121
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121545671/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to