From: Robert Yang <[email protected]>

There is a bug if we:
1) bitbake diffutils with MACHINE=crownbay
2) bitbake diffutils with MACHINE=qemux86
3) bitbake core-image-sato with MACHINE=crownbay

Then the diffutils.i586 would be installed to the crownbay's image, this
is because diffutils.i586 is newer than diffutils.core2, and rpm doesn't
respect to the arch priorities:

We have put the archs in order in _solve_dbpath:

crownbay/solvedb:core2/solvedb:i586/solvedb:all/solvedb

Fix rpm to respect to the order, for example, if it finds a pkg in both
core2/ and i586/, and the core2/ comes first, it should not use the one
in i586/ even if it's build time is newer.

Note: Don't worry about the _free(*ptr), it can check whether ptr is
NULL or not.

This is for the denzil branch, and the master branch also needs it.

[YOCTO #2360]

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
---
 .../rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch                 |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb             |    3 +-
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b63b37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-respect-arch.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+rpmts.c: respect to the arch priorities
+
+Let rpm respect to the priorities when choose alternatives rpm, the arch
+which comes first is preferred.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
+---
+ lib/rpmts.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
+ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/rpmts.c b/lib/rpmts.c
+index 3fbbc9e..40ec08e 100644
+--- a/lib/rpmts.c
++++ b/lib/rpmts.c
+@@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ int rpmtsSolve(rpmts ts, rpmds ds, /*@unused@*/ const void 
* data)
+     Header h = NULL;
+     size_t bhnamelen = 0;
+     time_t bhtime = 0;
++    const char *bharch = NULL;
+     rpmTag rpmtag;
+     const char * keyp;
+     size_t keylen = 0;
+@@ -409,6 +410,7 @@ fprintf(stderr, "--> %s(%p,%p,%p)\n", __FUNCTION__, ts, 
ds, data);
+       while ((h = rpmmiNext(mi)) != NULL) {
+           size_t hnamelen;
+           time_t htime;
++          const char *harch = NULL;
+ 
+           if (rpmtag == RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME && !rpmdsAnyMatchesDep(h, ds, 1))
+               continue;
+@@ -431,12 +433,23 @@ fprintf(stderr, "--> %s(%p,%p,%p)\n", __FUNCTION__, ts, 
ds, data);
+           if (htime <= bhtime)
+               continue;
+ 
++          /* XXX Respect to the arch priorities */
++          he->tag = RPMTAG_ARCH;
++          xx = headerGet(h, he, 0);
++          harch = ((xx && he->p.str) ? xstrdup(he->p.str) : NULL);
++          he->p.ptr = _free(he->p.ptr);
++          if (bharch && (strcmp(bharch, harch) != 0))
++              continue;
++
+           /* Save new "best" candidate. */
+           (void)headerFree(bh);
+           bh = NULL;
+           bh = headerLink(h);
+           bhtime = htime;
+           bhnamelen = hnamelen;
++          bharch = _free(bharch);
++          bharch = xstrdup(harch);
++          harch = _free(harch);
+       }
+       mi = rpmmiFree(mi);
+ 
+@@ -449,6 +462,7 @@ fprintf(stderr, "--> %s(%p,%p,%p)\n", __FUNCTION__, ts, 
ds, data);
+       } while (1);
+ 
+     }
++    bharch = _free(bharch);
+ 
+     /* Is there a suggested resolution? */
+     if (bh == NULL)
+-- 
+1.7.1
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
index 5ee6b47..d79d199 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1"
 DEPENDS = "bzip2 zlib db openssl elfutils expat libpcre attr acl popt 
${extrarpmdeps}"
 extrarpmdeps = "python perl file"
 extrarpmdeps_virtclass-native = "python-native file-native"
-PR = "r36"
+PR = "r37"
 
 # rpm2cpio is a shell script, which is part of the rpm src.rpm.  It is needed
 # in order to extract the distribution SRPM into a format we can extract...
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ SRC_URI = 
"http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.0-0.20101229.src.rpm;ex
           file://pythondeps.sh \
           file://rpmdeps-oecore.patch \
           file://rpm-resolvedep.patch \
+          file://rpm-respect-arch.patch \
          "
 
 #         file://rpm-autoconf.patch \
-- 
1.7.9.5


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to