On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 at 12:02, Etienne Cordonnier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > - last, but not least. Actually this is the most important one: fix your > relationship with GNU coreutils. It's painful to watch you two bicker, and > I do not want the Yocto project to be dragged into this. > > On the last point: I can see Collin feels strongly about this, and I take > the licensing concern seriously. But I haven't been in conflict with him or > with GNU coreutils. If there's a specific exchange you'd like me to look > at, please point me to it. > The risk of AI-assisted contributions that basically rewrite GPLd gnu coreutils C code into rust is very real, and it has happened in other projects, causing their complete derailment. Are you able to spot and reject such contributions? There's also a distinct lack of collaboration. Both projects obviously must implement the exact same UI, and the only way to do it is to have a shared, independent, rigorous test suite. Collin has explicitly said he is not endorsing the use of GNU tests for uutils. I'd also note that quietly skipping my points without saying anything about them only means they remain unresolved. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#247721): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/247721 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121685421/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
