On 06/14/2012 12:14 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:57 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/12/2012 12:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
Removed the x32 specific patches, since they seem to be fully
integrated into 4.7. Also removed the sigmask patch, since the
new version doesn't seem to use sigmask anymore.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu<[email protected]>
---
.../strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch | 23 -
.../strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch | 1242
--------------------
meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb | 23 -
meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb | 20 +
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch
delete mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb
Did you do a git mv? by removing and creating, the git history gets
lost, can you respin this?
This is an urban myth. git does not track renames, ever. Some of the
tools can detect and display things with "rename detection" though.
So the patch was just sent without rename detection, it will make no
difference to the history whatsoever if merged. It can be harder to
review though. Rename detection doesn't always work in the cases of
large delta, the exact threshold can be configured.
If that's the case, then this passed the rest of my testing also can
could be included in the C-Pull, I just dropped, I will pull it back in,
but not update the main request.
Sau!
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
