On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:32:07PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 6/28/12 3:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:43:28PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> On 6/28/12 2:12 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:05:32AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > >>>> Module: openembedded-core.git > >>>> Branch: master > >>>> Commit: 55c01de28a28a4cfe16d36663c190a874ef2e85d > >>>> URL: > >>>> http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=55c01de28a28a4cfe16d36663c190a874ef2e85d > >>>> > >>>> Author: Mark Hatle <[email protected]> > >>>> Date: Mon May 21 12:42:34 2012 -0500 > >>>> > >>>> util-linux: use new update-alternatives > >>>> > >>>> In addition to switching to the new update-alternatives, it was > >>>> discovered > >>>> that the sln, shutdown, halt, reboot and related commands were never > >>>> generated. > >>>> Remove these from the list. (These appear to have been removed from > >>>> util-linux > >>>> some time ago.) > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> This seems to break u-a for reset while upgrading from older image: > >>> > >>> update-alternatives: Error: cannot register alternative reset to > >>> /bin/reset since it is already registered to /usr/bin/reset > >> > >> Can you figure out what registered it as /usr/bin/reset? As far as I'm > >> aware > >> the reset command should be in /bin... (Sounds like this may simply be an > >> ordering thing.) > > > > seems like busybox did.. > > > > SHR root@Nokia-N900 / $ cat /var/lib/opkg/alternatives/reset > > /usr/bin/reset > > ../../bin/busybox 50 > > Is that the current busybox? If so, then util-linux is incorrect. It should > be > matching the behavior of busybox -- unless of course busybox has a bug. ;)
yes SHRZ root@zjama ~ $ grep reset /etc/busybox.links /usr/bin/reset I do not track every BB release.. so it's possible that they changed lately, but I haven't seen any busybox which should cause this, that's why I've replied on this commit.. Cheers, > > > But when I set this up originally, the intent was to follow what BB was doing. > > --Mark > > > Cheers, > > > >> > >> --Mark > >> > >>> anyone seen it too? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc | 212 > >>>> +++++---------------- > >>>> meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.21.1.bb | 2 +- > >>>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> Diff: > >>>> http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git/?a=commitdiff;h=55c01de28a28a4cfe16d36663c190a874ef2e85d > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Openembedded-commits mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-commits > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Openembedded-core mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Openembedded-core mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
