On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> some of the recent changes seem to break the parallel build of the gcc*
> recipes which are sharing a same source directory:
> 
> | $ ./bitbake gcc-cross-initial gcc-cross-intermediate gcc-cross -c 
> cleansstate
> | $ BB_NUMBER_THREADS=3 ./bitbake gcc-cross-initial gcc-cross-intermediate 
> gcc-cross
> | ...
> | NOTE: package 
> gcc-cross-initial-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: 
> task do_unpack: Started
> | NOTE: package 
> gcc-cross-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task 
> do_unpack: Started
> | NOTE: package 
> gcc-cross-initial-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: 
> task do_unpack: Succeeded
> | ERROR: Error executing a python function in 
> ...recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.7.bb:
> | OSError: [Errno 39] Directory not empty: 
> '...tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7/git/'
> | NOTE: package 
> gcc-cross-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task 
> do_unpack: Failed
> 
> It seems that the work-shared/ directory is not locked and cleaned when
> starting the second unpack.

I can confirm the same
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-July/026174.html

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to