On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 28/07/2012 21:24, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 08:49:48PM +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> >> I'm not sure quite what you mean by pre-processed output but here is my
> >> do_compile log which is where it fails.
> >
> > He meant C source code after processing by preprocessor (-E option for
> > gcc), but it's not needed, see following patch.
> >
> > The problem was that patch was applied only for target recipe not
> > -native which is failing for you (I guess you have (e)glibc-2.16 on host
> > like I do)
> >
> > Cheers,
> 
> Do you know what, I should have seen this as I applied my patch to the 
> BASE_SRC_URI. My patch failed with the same message again in the SRC_URI 
> and I thought I had just deleted Khems patch line and then re-added my 
> patch line in the wrong function.
> 
> I'll put it down to it being the weekend
> 
> I do have glibc-2.16 on my host and it's causing me no end of trouble - 
> but someone has be the lab rat eh and I'm not under commercial pressure 
> quite yet ;) I'll have another eglibc do_install issue coming along soon 
> as I can't seem to fix it.
> 
> What would be the process to get the preprocessed output?

cd to dir where the build is failing, copy last gcc call which was
failing with gets, replace -c with -E and rename -o param to foo.E,
execute and then send foo.E

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to