On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 07:30:38AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:02:24PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> On Jul 31, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> well not exactly like this one as this is causing > >>> /bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: Bad fd number > >>> probably from ">&" in dash > >> > >> > >> yes. I swear I have since fixed this patch this seems to be an older > >> version > >> did you look into meta-ti/master ? > > > > Yes, your patch is fixed in meta-ti, but cannot be used together with > > Otavio's patch to u-boot.inc. > > > > meta-ti is fine because it provides own u-boot.inc, but with your patch > > and u-boot.inc from oe-core it ends like this > > > so why don't you migrate the patch from meta-ti into OE-Core ? and leave this > sed > thing out ?
Because all layers using u-boot.inc from oe-core probably already have this patch and adding it to oe-core too will cause do_patch to fail. Or those layers are not using SRC_URI from u-boot.inc and then they won't get this patch anyway. And I don't want to introduce another kind of automagic which would add that patch to SRC_URI only if it's not added by some .bbappend already.. One character change in that regexp fixed all use-cases I can think of, so looks like best solution to me.. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
