On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Laurentiu Palcu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08/06/2012 11:10 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Laurentiu Palcu >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 08/06/2012 01:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andreas Müller >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Laurentiu Palcu >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> You could give it a test yourselves and let me know your results. I will >>>>>> send a version 2 of the patchset(as soon as we all agree on the >>>>>> solution), with some changes suggested by Mark and some PR bumps >>>>>> suggested by Koen. >>>>> With the image I usually work with [1] and AMD Phenom II X6 1090 16GB >>>>> RAM I get a measurable delay - see attachment. I would not be happy >>>>> loosing latest do_rootfs enhancements (off topic - thanks for that). >>>>> Remeber we are only talking of gtk-update-icon-cache. OK I could buy >>>>> an intel host and work just with sato images but... >>> I suppose you could, but nobody asked you to do that, it's your choice >>> what's your build machine or what you'll be building for. >>> >>> Thanks for the measurements though. They do, indeed, show quite a >>> significant amount of time (around 6 minutes). A run-once solution is to >>> be considered in this case. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Andreas >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-misc/blobs/master/recipes-image/xfce-full-image.bb >>>> OK I know it is not that important: The image created with this patch >>>> series creates tons of messages like >>> Why do you think is not important. Please elaborate. Or is it irony? >> Yes sorry - it was late night. > It's OK, let's work together and find the best solution for all of us. I > would also be pissed of if I had to wait an extra 6 minutes every > do_rootfs run. > >>> I don't think is in anybody's benefit if you take this approach. :) All >>> errors/warnings are important and they have to be taken care of. >>> >>>> >>>> xfdesktop:446): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module >>>> file '/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or >>>> directory >>>> >>>> and don't have icons at all. Did you run test that (on a hardware >>>> plattform different to your host)? >>> I only tested on qemu. And it worked just fine, without any errors. With >>> all icons in place. >> Which hardware did you emulate? My tests were done for overo (ARM >> cortext A8). I wonder if the created database is machine specific. > I used qemuarm. As far as I know, the database shouldn't be machine > specific. And, looking at the log you sent, it looks like all commands > succeeded. Otherwise, the 'time' application would also signal in the > log file if the command failed. Could please have a look, on your host > (xfce-full-image-1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/share/icons/hicolor or > xfce-full-image-1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/share/icons/gnome), to see if it > creates the icon-theme.cache files? It does for me and I don't > understand why it doesn't in your case... > I will check today evening since the machine with this data is at home...
Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
