On Aug 14, 2012 10:11 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > I've had to fix / hack the perf_3.4.bb<http://perf_3.4.bb> recipe to get it 
> > building on my
> > older kernel. Should we add perf_3.0.bb<http://perf_3.0.bb> recipes in 
> > oe-core or my own
> > layer? Or try to keep one recipe working for all versions? I have no
> > strong opinions.
>
> I'd prefer one recipe. Liang sent another proposal earlier for a fix
> that should make
> it work on all kernels. Just waiting to hear on that at the moment.

I've actually got other issues...

-M

>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
> >
> > -M
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to