On 17 August 2012 10:05, Andreas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Did you chase upstream about this -- I presume it's a genuine mistake >> (maybe the tarball was re-generated) but I'm curious. >> >> Ross > I did > * use the 1.8.1 hashes and let oe tell me the new ones > * add new hashes in recipe > * bitbake -ccleanall webkit-gtk > * bitbake webkit-gtk
That's what I did, but that doesn't mitigate the point that we should be validating checksums where possible. I just grabbed someone on IRC and they think that the checksums in the mail are for the wrong tarball... :) Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
