On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 17 August 2012 14:30:17 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Friday 17 August 2012 12:35:07 Ross Burton wrote: > > > > If someone still wants to use them, meta-oe is a better place for them > > > > to > > > > live. > > > > > > As a general note, personally I'd rather that no more alternative versions > > > of anything be added to meta-oe. > > > > Yes especially with DEFAULT_PREFERRENCE not working between layers.. so > > everyone with meta-oe and without P_V set, would get this old version.. > > The best plan it would seem to me would be to have a separate meta-archive or > meta-attic or similar named layer for these older recipes, and set its layer > priority to the same as OE-Core.
Should I file a but to fix DEFAULT_PREFERENCE between layers? Because there is also use case when newer development version is added to e.g. meta-oe with negative D_P and only users who decide to test/use that version should get it, if they define P_V for this new version. Currently it would became default version for all meta-oe users without P_V specified, which isn't very intuitive. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
