On 12-08-17 05:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy >>>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" >>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ >>>> >>>> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" >>>> >>>> -DEPENDS = "gconf" >>>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" >>>> >>> >>> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular >>> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we >>> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know >> >> Fair enough. >> >> Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines >> with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, >> since I was no longer on the To/Cc. >> >> AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. > > There were a few things causing problems here such as lost admin access. > Those have been resolved and I just changed the setting that I think was > causing the problems. Let me know if there are still issues...
Looks good now, thanks a lot. Much appreciated by many, I'm sure. Paul. -- > > Cheers, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
