On 08/19/2012 11:04 PM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 08/17/2012 06:55 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/17/2012 06:05 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <[email protected]>
---
.../coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch | 13
+++++++++++++
.../remove-gets.patch | 20
+++++++++++---------
.../remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch | 0
.../{coreutils_8.14.bb => coreutils_8.17.bb} | 9 +++++----
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils-8.14 =>
coreutils-8.17}/remove-gets.patch (47%)
rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils-8.14 =>
coreutils-8.17}/remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch (100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/coreutils/{coreutils_8.14.bb =>
coreutils_8.17.bb} (91%)
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6bbe7ee
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
Your new patch needs a header, explaining why, and adding
Upstream-Status and Signed-off-by tags.
I meant this only as an RFC, to get feedback for my patch, from a
functional point of view, it is not intended to be the final patch.
I have a Signed-off-by tag, are you referring to something else?
Can you give me more details about Upstream-Status? I've google'd this
problem for a bit but could not find an existing patch for it, nor a bug
filled for this matter. Since I don't know yet if what I'm fixing it's
really a bug (or a misconfiguration on my side) I send this RFC to get a
hold of whether I'm on the good track here or not. If this patch turns
out to be valid, I'll get in touch with the guys from coreutils' mailing
lists, and try to push it upstream.
Radu,
For patches included in a given recipe we also have Signed-off-by as
well as the Upstream-Status tag as defined by:
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Please review this again.
Thanks
Sau!
radu
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
