On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Paul Eggleton < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 01:28:51 Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > For machines with no hardware clock it makes no sense to have this > > init stript. Moreover, we avoid a boot error in this way. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb > > b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb index 6487436..2947509 > 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ RDEPENDS_task-core-boot = "\ > > base-files \ > > base-passwd \ > > busybox \ > busybox-hwclock contains the hwclock init script. Before this change that script was included in busybox main package which was added to this task. I didn't want to move this package as this change would have been a different commit - to move stuff from stuff - and because i didn't want to break anything around. ag > > + ${@base_contains("MACHINE_FEATURES", "rtc", "busybox-hwclock", "", > d)} > > \ ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts} \ > > ${@base_contains("MACHINE_FEATURES", "keyboard", > > "${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_keymaps}", "", d)} \ modutils-initscripts \ > > Why did this get added to task-core-boot? This is meant only to contain > items > that are essential for booting; I'm not sure that support for the rtc > qualifies. > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
