On 09/06/2012 02:58 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
By having a high priority it will be installed instead of the mini-x-session
when both are in a give set of packagegroups, as it stands now the
mini-x-session is installed by default on sato which is wrong!

This issue occurred because during the packagegroup reorganization, the mini-x-session was added to core-x11-base

The mini-x-session is really targeted for the build appliance and maybe it's name caused some confusion. I would suggest we might want to create a different x-session file for core-x11-base and/or rename the mini-x-session, since it's not appropriate.


Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]>
---
  .../matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb       |    4 ++--
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb 
b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
index f4be279..b9e83a5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "matchbox-common"
  SRC_URI = "file://matchbox-session"
  S = "${WORKDIR}"

-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"

  inherit update-alternatives

  ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "x-session-manager"
  ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[x-session-manager] = "${bindir}/matchbox-session"
-ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "10"
+ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"

  do_install() {
        install -d ${D}/${bindir}


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to