On 09/06/2012 02:58 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
By having a high priority it will be installed instead of the mini-x-session
when both are in a give set of packagegroups, as it stands now the
mini-x-session is installed by default on sato which is wrong!
This issue occurred because during the packagegroup reorganization, the
mini-x-session was added to core-x11-base
The mini-x-session is really targeted for the build appliance and maybe
it's name caused some confusion. I would suggest we might want to
create a different x-session file for core-x11-base and/or rename the
mini-x-session, since it's not appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]>
---
.../matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
index f4be279..b9e83a5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/matchbox-session/matchbox-session_0.1.bb
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "matchbox-common"
SRC_URI = "file://matchbox-session"
S = "${WORKDIR}"
-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"
inherit update-alternatives
ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "x-session-manager"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[x-session-manager] = "${bindir}/matchbox-session"
-ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "10"
+ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"
do_install() {
install -d ${D}/${bindir}
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core