On 12-09-11 12:55 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (11/09/12 00:52), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-11 12:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (10/09/12 14:11), Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Updating to 3.4.10 which has been soaking for a bit now, as well
as picking up the following meta commits from Tom Z:
would it also need bumping linux-libc-headers too ?
There's no new interfaces in the -stable updates, so there's no reason
to bump. I typically elect to jump to a 3.x.0 and leave it there, but
we had an interim bump that I wouldn't have done .. so we sit at 3.4.3
at the moment (which is still fine).
OK. Next question is, do stable updates get changes such that we need to
bump the linux-libc-headers ?
Not that I've ever seen. Since there are no new features or user exported
defines that make it into the -stable updates, using the base version
headers
is reasonable. It saves churn, and keeps all of the QA and testing
results directly applicable throughout feature freeze by leaving the
the stable.
Cheers,
Bruce
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
