On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:44:28PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:39 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 September 2012 15:28, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Which patches were you thinking of specifically? I don't think there > > > are many that we apply which are actually related to cross-compiling. > > > > no-libelf and no-dbus. > > > > Looking at the patches we are carrying, it's quite comic. Two patches > > which are carried with no understanding of why... > > no-dbus isn't anything to do with cross-compiling as such, it's to avoid > an extra build dependency on dbus. I've no idea what exactly no-libelf > is trying to accomplish though it does also look like it's intended to > prevent an extra library dependency.
yes, see 2929e7d590862d9649458c90804e79a1dce40423 where it was introduced > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
